Fetal neurosonography and infant neurobehavior following conception by assisted reproductive technology with fresh or frozen embryo transfer
Por:
Boutet ML, Eixarch E, Ahumada-Droguett P, Nakaki A, Crovetto F, Cívico MS, Borrás A, Manau D, Gratacós E, Crispi F and Casals G
Publicada:
1 nov 2022
Ahead of Print:
1 oct 2022
Resumen:
Objective We aimed to explore fetal cortical brain development by neurosonography in fetuses conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART), including frozen and fresh embryo transfer (ET), compared with those conceived spontaneously (SC), and to investigate its association with infant neurobehavior at 12 months of age. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of 210 singleton pregnancies, including 70 SC pregnancies, 70 conceived by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) following frozen ET and 70 conceived by IVF after fresh ET. Fetal neurosonography was performed at 32 +/- 2 gestational weeks to assess cortical development. Sulci depths were measured offline and normalized by biparietal diameter (BPD). Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) were completed postnatally, at 12 +/- 1months of corrected age. Neurosonographic findings were adjusted by regression analysis for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, fetal sex and fetal-weight centile and gestational age at scan, and ASQ scores were adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, educational level and employment status, gestational age at birth, breastfeeding, infant sex and infant age at the ASQ evaluation. Results Overall, in comparison to the SC fetuses, fetuses conceived by ART showed statistically significant differences in cortical development, with reduced parieto-occipital sulci depth adjusted for BPD (mean +/- SD: fresh ET, 12.5 +/- 2.5 vs frozen ET, 13.4 +/- 2.6 vs SC, 13.4 +/- 2.6, P< 0.001), cingulate sulci depth adjusted for BPD (median (interquartile range (IQR)): fresh ET, 5.8 (4.2- 7.4) vs frozen ET, 5.8 (4.1- 7.5) vs SC, 6.5 (4.8- 7.8), P= 0.001) and calcarine sulci depth adjusted for BPD (median (IQR): fresh ET, 13.5(10.1- 16.1) vs frozen ET, 14.5 (12.1- 15.8) vs SC, 16.4 (14.3- 17.9), P< 0.001), together with lower Sylvian fissure grading score. Changes in cortical development were more pronounced in the fresh ET than in the frozen ET group. ART infants showed lower ASQ scores as compared to SC infants, particularly in the fresh ET group (mean +/- SD global ASQ Z-score: fresh ET, - 0.3 +/- 0.4 vs frozen ET, - 0.2 +/- 0.4 vs SC, 0 +/- 0.4, P< 0.001). Conclusions Fetuses conceived by ART show a distinctive pattern of cortical development and suboptimal infant neurodevelopment, with more pronounced changes in those conceived following fresh ET. These findings support the existence of in-utero brain reorganization associated with ART and warrant follow-up studies to assess its long-term persistence. (c) 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Filiaciones:
Boutet ML:
BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Eixarch E:
BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Madrid, Spain
Ahumada-Droguett P:
BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Nakaki A:
BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Crovetto F:
BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Cívico MS:
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Assisted Reproduction Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Borrás A:
Assisted Reproduction Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Manau D:
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Assisted Reproduction Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Gratacós E:
BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Madrid, Spain
Crispi F:
BCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu). Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBER-ER), Madrid, Spain
Casals G:
Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
Assisted Reproduction Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Green Submitted, hybrid
|