Effectiveness of one and two doses of acellular pertussis vaccines against laboratory-confirmed pertussis requiring hospitalisation in infants: Results of the PERTINENT sentinel surveillance system in six EU/EEA countries, December 2015-December 2019


Por: Merdrignac L, Aït El Belghiti F, Pandolfi E, Acosta L, Fabiánová K, Habington A, García Cenoz M, Bøås H, Toubiana J, Tozzi AE, Jordán-García I, Zavadilová J, O'Sullivan N, Navascués A, Flem E, Croci I, Jané M, Krížová P, Cotter S, Fernandino L, Bekkevold T, Munoz-Almagro C, Bacci S, Kramarz P, Kissling E and Savulescu C

Publicada: 2 abr 2024 Ahead of Print: 1 abr 2024
Resumen:
Background: Monitoring effectiveness of pertussis vaccines is necessary to adapt vaccination strategies. PERTINENT, Pertussis in Infants European Network, is an active sentinel surveillance system implemented in 35 hospitals across six EU/EEA countries. We aim to measure pertussis vaccines effectiveness (VE) by dose against hospitalisation in infants aged <1 year. Methods: From December 2015 to December 2019, participating hospitals recruited all infants with pertussis-like symptoms. Cases were vaccine-eligible infants testing positive for Bordetella pertussis by PCR or culture; controls were those testing negative to all Bordetella spp. For each vaccine dose, we defined an infant as vaccinated if she/ he received the corresponding dose >14 days before symptoms. Unvaccinated were those who did not receive any dose. We calculated (one-stage model) pooled VE as 100*(1-odds ratio of vaccination) adjusted for country, onset date (in 3-month categories) and age-group (when sample allowed it). Results: Of 1,393 infants eligible for vaccination, we included 259 cases and 746 controls. Median age was 16 weeks for cases and 19 weeks for controls (p < 0.001). Median birth weight and gestational age were 3,235 g and week 39 for cases, 3,113 g and week 39 for controls. Among cases, 119 (46 %) were vaccinated: 74 with one dose, 37 two doses, 8 three doses. Among controls, 469 (63 %) were vaccinated: 233 with one dose, 206 two doses, 30 three doses. Adjusted VE after at least one dose was 59 % (95 %CI: 36-73). Adjusted VE was 48 % (95 %CI: 5-71) for dose one (416 eligible infants) and 76 % (95 %CI: 43-90) for dose two (258 eligible infants). Only 42 infants were eligible for the third dose. Conclusions: Our results suggest moderate one -dose and two -dose VE in infants. Larger sample size would allow more precise estimates for dose one, two and three.

Filiaciones:
Merdrignac L:
 Epidemiology Department, Epiconcept, Paris, France

Aït El Belghiti F:
 Direction des maladies infectieuses, Santé Publique France, Paris, France

Pandolfi E:
 Preventive and Predictive Medicine Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCSS, Rome, Italy

Acosta L:
 Public Health Agency of Catalonia (ASPCAT), Barcelona, Spain

 Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya- BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain

Fabiánová K:
 National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic

Habington A:
 Children's Health Ireland, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland

García Cenoz M:
 Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA - Navarre Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain

Bøås H:
 Division of Infection Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213 Oslo, Norway

Toubiana J:
 Biodiversité et Epidémiologie des bactéries et pathogènes, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

 National Reference Center for Whooping Cough and Other Bordetella Infections, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France

Tozzi AE:
 Preventive and Predictive Medicine Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCSS, Rome, Italy

Jordán-García I:
 Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain

 CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain

 University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Zavadilová J:
 National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic

O'Sullivan N:
 Children's Health Ireland, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland

Navascués A:
 Hospital Universitario Navarra, Pamplona

Flem E:
 Division of Infection Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213 Oslo, Norway

Croci I:
 Preventive and Predictive Medicine Research Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCSS, Rome, Italy

Jané M:
 Public Health Agency of Catalonia (ASPCAT), Barcelona, Spain

 CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain

 University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Krížová P:
 National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic

Cotter S:
 Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Dublin, Ireland

Fernandino L:
 Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA - Navarre Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain

Bekkevold T:
 Division of Infection Control, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, 0213 Oslo, Norway

Munoz-Almagro C:
 Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain

 CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain

 Medicine Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

Bacci S:
 European Centre for Diseases Control and Prevention, Stockholm, Sweden

Kramarz P:
 European Centre for Diseases Control and Prevention, Stockholm, Sweden

Kissling E:
 Epidemiology Department, Epiconcept, Paris, France

Savulescu C:
 Epidemiology Department, Epiconcept, Paris, France
ISSN: 0264410X





Vaccine
Editorial
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, ENGLAND, Reino Unido
Tipo de documento: Article
Volumen: 42 Número: 9
Páginas: 2370-2379
WOS Id: 001228340300001
ID de PubMed: 38472070
imagen Green Submitted, hybrid

MÉTRICAS